Let’s Revisit 9/11/2001 & Reexamine the Evidence

by Roger Due [9-14-2023 published].

(Even after 22 years, the true story of what happened on 9/11/2001 with the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and Pennsylvania with the so-called '4 planes' is still not being properly discussed. The "official government report" is a cover up and doesn't even analyze much of the raw data. Most of the "9/11 truther movement" is complicit with the cover up. Let's take another look at the available data. I'm going to avoid the question of 'who did it', because that is a can of worms with no resolutions at this time. Besides, there is a lot of evidence that our own government was part of the problem and they will never allow the true story to be told. — Roger Due)

NO 'Muslim hijackers' flew any of those 4 planes

Let's get this issue out of the way up front by taking a look at some of the information on the following website.

9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers

Captain Dan Hanley is an American citizen and is the director and international public spokesperson of the global “9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers”. One of his objectives is to show that there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11 aircraft. If aircraft flew into the Twin Towers, they could have been hijacked by an uninterruptible autopilot system that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft and guide it to the desired destination. Once engaged remotely, the pilot cannot disconnect the system. (I will show later that none of the alleged planes flew into their targets.)

Experienced pilots know that the rooky “Muslim hijackers” could never have flown the advanced commercial jets on 9/11, when they barely passed flight lessons in a little Piper Cub. Even highly trained pilots could not have flown the given profiles on that fateful day. We have interviewed experienced pilots who are willing to look at the actual data and explain the skills and aptitudes a pilot must master to be able to fly advanced commercial jets like those that were possibly used on 9/11.

In addition to the 3000 people killed in the WTC Twin Towers, millions of additional people have been killed, maimed, and/or displaced from their homelands in the Middle East and South Asia as a result of the horrific 9/11 crimes. In addition, the Muslim community has been denigrated by falsely blaming Muslims for something that they couldn’t have done.

About Captain Dan Hanley The following information is from his website...

I commenced flying over fifty years ago in 1968, first as a civilian pilot, then as a naval aviator, and finally as a United Airlines captain being forced into a wrongful and illegal early retirement by the FAA, United Airlines management, and my union eleven years prior to my mandatory retirement age of 65 in 2003 for speaking out about safety, security, and other 9/11-related issues.

Over a career span of 35 years, I flew 15 different types of aircraft accumulating over 20,000 flight hours.

With all of my flight experience, I can unequivocally state that I could not possibly have flown the 9/11 flight profiles, in particular the Pentagon profile, at those speeds and altitudes and flying the spectacular aerial maneuvers performed by the alleged hijackers.

I do not believe that the alleged poorly trained and highly inexperienced 9/11 Muslim hijackers could have possibly been in control of the aircraft that day as they had never flown a jet aircraft before in their lives, never mind the very complex and highly sophisticated B-757/767 aircraft. It is my assertion that the vast majority of the over 300,000 pilots in the world today will agree with my contention.

After Dan Hanley was railroaded out of United Airlines on false allegations and was deprived of ever flying again, his wife wanted a divorce. A friend introduced him to a wonderful lady in Pakistan who was a TV news anchor. They are happily married and have been living in Pakistan for over 13 years.

Pilot Interviews You can listen to other skilled pilots interviewed by Captain Hanley who also explain why the alleged Muslim hijackers couldn't have flown those airplanes.

I'm currently editing Dan's "Grounded" book that will be published as an Amazon Best Seller:

Captain Dan Hanley’s American Dream Came True!

For youngster Dan Hanley, as a boy, the dream of flying was not just everything, it was the only thing. Grounded is the story of his arduous and triumphant struggle to realize his great American dream, only to find he had landed in the bleak terrain of a living nightmare.

Through more than a decade of commitment, strategy, hardship and sacrifice, Dan Hanley ultimately racked up a sterling reputation as a Naval pilot. Proffered a Pentagon promotion, Dan opted instead to follow his childhood dream to be a commercial airline pilot.

He landed a starting position at United Airlines — at the worst possible time. Corporate owners had just had Congress pass deregulation of the airline industry. As Hanley was soon to learn, in the ‘Greed is Good’ era, what was ‘good for business’ was terrible for employees and passengers!

Economic and working conditions spiraled downward as airline management, Federal controllers, and organized labor leaders formed a united blockade to intimidate employees into silence over egregious ‘cost-saving’ safety lapses which could easily prove fatal for employees and passengers.

When Captain Hanley tried every resource in an attempt to redress these perilous evils and more, he discovered that the warnings he was receiving from well-meaning contacts were true. Ruthless, ruinous responses from virtually ALL of the ‘powers-that-be’ in the USA were to cost Captain Hanley his career, his life's earnings, and his beloved family.

This is the story of what it means to be GROUNDED!

GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems

As stated above, the four allegedly hijacked airplanes never made contact with the intended targets. Since the alleged 'Muslim hijackers' couldn't have flown those planes, some have suggest that an uninterruptible autopilot system could have been used, which is discussed here.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/AutopilotSystemsMonaghan.pdf [June 2012 | Aidan Monaghan (B.Sc., EET)] Plausibility of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated by GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems

Abstract: New supporting evidence is presented and footnoted. The alleged flight performances of inexperienced terrorist pilots accused of operating complex flight control systems of four aircraft during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 has surprised observers. Moreover, official information presented to demonstrate terrorist pilot control of the said aircraft has been either unverifiable or demonstrated to contain noteworthy anomalies. The flight paths of the September 11, 2001 attack aircraft bear characteristics common to the capabilities provided by precision automated flight control systems and related commercial aviation technology that emerged just prior to these attacks. The unreported use of augmented GPS guided auto-pilot aircraft systems in order to perform the said aircraft attacks is hypothesized.

https://morganreynolds.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/070308_mr_rfc.pdf [3/8/2007] Morgan Reynolds: Request for Correction by NIST for Its Invalid WTC Jetliner Animations and Analysis.

For many who understand how fragile a commercial airplane is when it runs into an immovable barrier, the official narrative about the two planes crashing into the Twin Towers didn’t seem right.

The above Morgan Reynolds 18-page “Request for Correction…” clearly shows that the NIST analysis was incorrect and violated fundamental laws of physics and engineering. In other words, the two planes could not have crashed into the Twin Towers. It is possible that some sort of drone could have been used to show an impact where GPS could have been a factor.

The NIST computer simulations and analysis of the planes hitting the Twin Towers purported to show and/or demonstrate four conditions, yet a careful technical analysis calls into question their observations, as Reynolds points out:

These purported phenomena, as mentioned above and as described by NIST and its contractors, are not independently verifiable and do not have a scientifically valid basis for making the assumption that the simulated conditions could actually have occurred. Equally significant, the preparation of simulations that depict conditions that violate scientific principles serves only to mislead and to set the conditions for false conclusions to be enunciated. That is what has transpired and that is what must be corrected, all as more fully treated hereunder.

Reynolds goes into great detail to show that the NIST analysis is flawed. For example, NIST assumed that the planes hit the towers and failed to decelerate, which is impossible.

All videos that “record” penetration by UA 175 into the south tower show no collision/crash and no deceleration. Instead, the jetliner image is “absorbed” by the building without deceleration; we just see a jetliner image glide into the tower and disappear without losing a flap, panel, wing tip or tail section.

Throughout the Reynolds analysis, well established laws of physics were repeatedly ignored by NIST, which obviously brings into question the NIST conclusions.

An aluminum jetliner cannot push through steel walls, steel-reinforced concrete floors, and a steel core of 47 cross-braced steel columns and disappear yet suddenly turn into shredded aluminum and other shredded materials.

Virtually intact penetration is impossible because an aluminum jetliner is light and fragile and is not built to survive collisions with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and concrete.

Gashes in the towers, in addition, were too small to completely absorb the alleged aircraft.

Item 3 is false since there was no aircraft debris showering down below the impact zone. Videos of the “glide-ins” and still pictures below the gashes support this conclusion.

There is a lot more in the Reynolds report that warrants attention and calls into question the official story.

Where Did The WTC Twin Towers Go?
Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

https://www.drjudywood.com “The Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in midair.” (This excellent website by Dr. Judy Wood presents the analysis of what happened at the World Trade Center & Twin Towers that couldn't be explained by existing engineering, architectural, & physics analysis.)

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise.

In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips, a large volume of witness testimony, analyses of dust samples, seismic data, and the analysis of other environmental evidence pertaining to the destruction of the World Trade Center complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal Qui Tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood’s investigation and body of evidence as compiled in her book is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? is not a book of poetry, yet it has some beautiful prose. It is not a novel yet it tells a complete story. It is not a photography book, yet the pictures will grab you. It is not just a text book, yet its data is empirical and it teaches critical thinking. It is not the Bible yet it will be one of the most important books you will ever read.

Dr. Wood received her

• B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
• M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
• Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including

• Experimental Stress Analysis,
• Engineering Mechanics,
• Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
• Strength of Materials Testing

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.

One of Dr. Wood’s research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. In recent years, Dr. Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/presentations This has 3 video presentations by Dr. Wood that are worthy of your attention.

1. #911 Truth Part 15: Feature Presentation: The Dawn of a New Age by Dr. Judy Wood
2. Dr. Judy Wood at New Horizons – Where Did the Towers Go – Part 1
3. Judy Wood in Toronto (9-11-2015) | Conspiracy Culture

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/dustification Dustification

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/toasted-cars Toasted Cars

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/energy Energy and Heat. There is little evidence of high heat being involved in the destruction of the WTC.

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/weather Weather

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/seismic Seismic and Bathtub

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/documentaries The following 2 documentaries here are worthy of your attention.

1. Hurricane Erin – Part 1 Manufactured Story | Irrefutable Episode 6
2. Where Did the Towers Go? Implications of the Forensic Study & Cover Up

https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564 [January 2010 | 10.5”x7.5” hardcover book | 544 pages] Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11.

This book is a forensic analysis of what effectively is a crime scene. Ground Zero and the surrounding areas were photographed countless thousands of times, yet no one really assessed all of the phenomena found in these photographs. What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1. WHAT happened, then
2. HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3. WHO did it. And only then can we address
4. WHY they did it (i.e., motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11.

(I purchased and have read this entire engineering book and was able to follow much of the analyses because of my physics and technical background. Dr. Wood doesn’t try to determine who was responsible for 9/11. She focuses on trying to understand how the many observed effects could possibly be explained by engineering, physics, and architectural knowledge at the time of 9/11. Unfortunately, many observed phenomena couldn’t be explained. She then proceeds to research and piece together new understandings that were behind what was observed on 9/11. Any honest analysis of how 9/11 was actually carried out must be reconciled with the technical analysis uncovered by Dr. Judy Wood. — Roger Due)

CHECK the EVIDENCE

checktheevidence.com Andrew Johnson's website

Andrew Johnson has a degree in computer science & physics and lives in England. I've communicated with him via Skype & email. In 2004 he realized that the Official Story of the 9/11 attacks couldn’t be true. The Twin Towers couldn’t have been destroyed solely as a result of jet impacts and burning jet fuel. He studied Dr. Judy Wood’s research, “Where Did the Towers Go?”. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) claimed that the towers collapsed. That is misleading, because the towers did not collapse, they turned to dust.

Although Andrew knew that the official story was false, it took another two years to realize that the plane crashes at the WTC could not have been real, even though it seemed that something hit the WTC towers. Studying the observed evidence became critical to understanding what could and could not have happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11.

Andrew observes:

The best theories explain the most evidence – and this applies to both physical evidence and circumstantial evidence. I can confidently say that Dr. Wood’s study and general conclusion explain the most evidence of any set of theories out there. Additionally, Dr. Wood’s background is the most suitable of any of the people that have “stepped out of the box” to deal with the 9/11 issues.

Andrew has worked closely with Dr. Wood. He is also helping Dr. Reiner Fuellmich of ICIC.LAW understand what happened on 9/11 and the implications. See the included ICIC information for details. The following two PDF books by Andrew Johnson, which I've read, take a close look at the evidence and shed a lot of light on what did and didn’t happen with the Twin Towers.

https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/9-11-finding-the-truth-by-andrew-johnson [July 2011] 9/11 Finding the Truth.

https://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf [November 2017] 9-11 – Holding the Truth by Andrew Johnson.

International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC.LAW)

https://icic.law/en

Who is Dr Reiner Fuellmich?

My name is Dr Reiner Fuellmich and I am originally from the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen. I live and work in Göttingen and California and am admitted to the bar in Germany and California.

I have been practicing as a litigator for over 25 years. In the beginning, the focus was on medical malpractice cases, but then came more and more cases in which I was allowed to represent injured parties of corporations and banks – especially those who were damaged by the so-called „junk real estate cases“ by Deutsche Bank.

In 2004, I even filed a 45-page criminal complaint against the then chairman of the 11th BGH senate on behalf of an aggrieved party. This senate – in contrast to the 9th senate – also “banking senate“ – had made conspicuously bank-friendly and customer-damaging judgements. This criminal complaint was a unique action by a lawyer in German judicial history until then.

These cases made it increasingly clear to me that there is a lot wrong with the German justice system – and that “being right“ and “being proven right“ often do not go hand in hand.

Restart with ICIC

After having accompanied the Corona Committee since the beginning of the Covid 19 pandemic, which then continued without my involvement for well-known reasons, it was important to me not only to continue the previous efforts, but rather to expand and deepen them.

Thus, at the end of 2022, I founded ICIC.LAW – the International Crime Investigative Committee. The first official acts related to putting my team back together, finding new and reliable team members and thus building a new base.

It was clear that I wanted to continue conducting interviews that would lead to the professional and factual clarification of the machinations of the so-called „elite“. Unlike before, however, it should be even clearer, more structured and more professional. For a real clarification, it is not enough to only question the side that shares my opinion and knowledge anyway – other sides and views must also be able to have their say.

So, with the new team, I am starting out to shed more light on the abysses of our world planning and coordination. Because I am absolutely convinced that the light always wins.

We will continue to work on education and enlightenment far beyond „Corona“. Multiple complex and interwoven issues need to be addressed in their entirety. This includes questions like:

What is going on in Ukraine and how could it come to the current situation? What exactly is going on with „climate change“ and what factors can trigger it? Can climate change be stopped or does man-made climate change even exist? The effects of the food crisis, rising global inflation and unaffordable energy costs, all these things concern people and they have legitimate questions. We look closely, we ask experts, we get answers.

Identifying and offering solutions

How can regional ideas of a grassroots democratic, free and independent coexistence be networked in different forms? Which tailor-made rules for the basic pillars of a functioning society, such as education, health and energy production can be redeveloped and set in motion in order to find genuine „sustainability“? Here, we want to show new and feasible perspectives.

Research, the gaining of knowledge and the recognition of spirituality as a further pillar of society

What does „science“ actually mean and where are its limits? Do such limits exist at all or is the exploration of our world limitless? In the past, many new discoveries were originally labelled „unscientific“, but later these conclusions were revised. Today, we often take such discoveries and achievements for granted.

To what extent can holistic aspects be integrated into a new form of society, and what exactly does spirituality mean? Is it perhaps one of the prerequisites needed for transformation into a truly peaceful and prosperous society in harmony with one another and nature?

We want to know and share all the answers.

https://rumble.com/v2xds92-911-ufo-false-flags-and-freie-energie-teil-1.html [7-1-2023] 9/11, UFO False Flags & Free Energy – Part 1.

In this first of a three-part episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with British researcher who is a technology tutor and software engineer Andrew Johnson, who in the course of his detailed research on the 9/11 attack and other topics also came across various concepts of state-sponsored terrorism. It is now an open secret that secret groups within governments, for example, fund terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or fundamentalist groups like the Taliban and others.

https://rumble.com/v2xpes6-911-ufo-false-flags-and-free-energy-part-2.html [7-2-2023] 9/11, UFO False Flags & Free Energy – Part 2.

In these second of three episodes of ICIC the conversation with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and the British researcher who is a technology tutor and software engineer Andrew Johnson continues, in which he uses numerous images and video material to establish the connections between the events surrounding 9/11 and many phenomena and events that at first glance appear to be independent of each other. He connects many dots in his vivid lecture that, when viewed over a longer period of time, create "aha effects" and a desire for further knowledge.

https://rumble.com/v2xwx78-911-ufo-false-flags-and-free-energy-part-3.html [7-3-2023] 9/11, UFO False Flags & Free Energy – Part 3.

In this third and final episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and British researcher who is a technology tutor and software engineer Andrew Johnson talk about more shocking and strange details surrounding the complexities and hidden connections of the topics discussed at length. Both believe that these hitherto hidden circumstances, events, symbolisms and synchronicities must be made available to the public as widely as possible, without interruption, so that people can begin to see more clearly, use their own minds and finally stop just believing what they are told.